There has been a lot of debate about whether Jesus ate fish after his resurrection. Some argue that since he was no longer bound by earthly limitations, he would have no need for food. Others believe that he did eat fish, as evidenced by the accounts in the Bible.
The Biblical Accounts
The Gospel of Luke describes how Jesus appeared to his disciples after his resurrection and asked them if they had anything to eat. They gave him a piece of broiled fish, and he ate it in their presence (Luke 24:41-43). This seems to suggest that Jesus did eat fish after his resurrection.
Some argue that the story of Jesus eating fish is simply symbolic and doesn’t actually mean that he physically consumed it. Fish was a common symbol used by early Christians to represent Jesus, so the story could be interpreted as a metaphor for the disciples’ recognition of Jesus as the Christ.
Theologians and scholars have debated this issue for centuries, but ultimately, there is no definitive answer. It ultimately comes down to individual interpretation of the biblical text.
Regardless of whether or not Jesus ate fish after his resurrection, what is important is the message behind the story. It shows that even though Jesus had risen from the dead and transcended earthly limitations, he was still able to connect with his disciples in a very human way.