Why Does Jesus Christ Superstar Not Include the Resurrection?

The musical “Jesus Christ Superstar” is a renowned theatrical production that has captivated audiences worldwide since its debut in 1970. The rock opera was written by Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice and tells the story of Jesus Christ’s final days, leading up to his crucifixion. However, one notable aspect of the story that is missing from the production is the resurrection.

Why Was The Resurrection Not Included?

The omission of the resurrection from “Jesus Christ Superstar” has been a topic of debate since its inception. Many wonder why such a significant event in Christian theology was not included in the musical’s storyline.

One reason for this could be that Webber and Rice wanted to focus solely on Jesus’ humanity and his struggles as a mortal man. In an interview with Rolling Stone in 1971, Webber stated that he wanted to explore “the political power play between Jesus and the Roman Empire,” rather than delve into religious doctrine.

The Resurrection As A Divine Element

Moreover, the resurrection could have been seen as a divine element in the story, which would have taken away from its humanistic themes. By leaving out such a significant event as the resurrection, Webber and Rice were able to create a more relatable portrayal of Jesus’ character.

Another possible reason for omitting the resurrection could be to leave room for interpretation. By ending the musical with Jesus’ death on the cross, viewers are left to draw their conclusions about what happens next. This approach allows for individual interpretation and personal reflection on one’s beliefs.


In conclusion, while it may seem odd that such an essential part of Christian theology was left out of “Jesus Christ Superstar,” it ultimately allowed for a more humanistic portrayal of Jesus’ character. By focusing on his struggles as a man rather than his divinity, the musical was able to resonate with audiences worldwide. The omission of the resurrection also allows for greater individual interpretation and reflection on one’s beliefs.